The Reason for the Existence of Ammendments to the US...

The United States Constitution is one of the most famous documents in the world. This fame comes because it was the first of its kind; a special document that is so much more than just ink on paper. Many have tried to imitate and emulate it, with varying degrees of success. In the vast and lengthy span of human history, the United States Constitution is truly something remarkable. A new age of government and democracy was born from the creation of this document. Never before had the world seen a form of governing so complex yet affording so many freedoms. Empires such as Rome and England had tried to accomplish what the Americans did, but it always remained out of their grasp. The American Constitution was never intended to become what it has. When the founding fathers met to change and reconstruct the Articles of Confederation, they never assumed that they would be creating an entirely new constitution and system of government. What they created in the end would be the concrete foundation for one of the most powerful countries in human history. For the past 225 years, the Constitution has been the supreme law of the United States, guaranteeing democracy and freedom for generations of people. Incredibly, the foundations and ideals of the Constitution have remained largely intact throughout that time, with only twenty-seven changes (amendments) being made during its lifetime. The simple and straightforward purpose of the United States Constitution was to create a new systemShow MoreRelatedEssay on Is America Really the Home of the Free?2251 Words   |  10 PagesFree†. When America first started out in the Colonies the above quote was probably very true. As time has passed through the centuries, America has felt the need to regulate and reduce the freedom that our founding fathers had intentionally planned for us. Such things as religion, reproductive rights, Native Americans and their rights, and marriage rights are being marginalized. These rights could be considered private matters that the government shouldn’t get involved with and probably rightly so.

Francisco Pizarro, Spanish Conqueror of the Inca

Francisco Pizarro (ca. 1475–June 26, 1541) was a Spanish explorer and conquistador. With a small force of Spaniards, he was able to capture Atahualpa, emperor of the mighty Inca Empire, in 1532. Eventually, he led his men to victory over the Inca, collecting mind-boggling quantities of gold and silver along the way. Fast Facts: Francisco Pizarro Known For: Spanish conquistador who conquered the Inca EmpireBorn: ca. 1471–1478 in Trujillo, Extremadura, SpainParents: Gonzalo Pizarro Rodrà ­guez de Aguilar and Francisca Gonzalez, a maid in the Pizarro householdDied: June 26, 1541 in Lima, PeruSpouse(s): Inà ©s Huaylas Yupanqui (Quispe Sisa).Children: Francisca Pizarro Yupanqui, Gonzalo Pizarro Yupanqui Early Life Francisco Pizarro was born between 1471 and 1478 as one of several illegitimate children of Gonzalo Pizarro Rodrà ­guez de Aguilar, a nobleman in Extremadura province, Spain. Gonzalo had fought with distinction in wars in Italy; Franciscos mother was Francisca Gonzalez, a maid in the Pizarro household. As a young man, Francisco lived with his mother and siblings and tended animals in the fields. As a bastard, Pizarro could expect little in the way of inheritance and decided to become a soldier. It is likely that he followed in his fathers footsteps to the battlefields of Italy for a time before hearing of the riches of the Americas. He first went to the New World in 1502 as part of a colonization expedition led by Nicolà ¡s de Ovando. San Sebastià ¡n de Uraba and the Darià ©n In 1508, Pizarro joined the Alonso de Hojeda expedition to the mainland. They fought the natives and created a settlement called San Sebastià ¡n de Urabà ¡. Beset by angry natives and low on supplies, Hojeda set out for Santo Domingo in early 1510 for reinforcements and supplies. When Hojeda did not return after 50 days, Pizarro set out with the surviving settlers to return to Santo Domingo. Along the way, they joined an expedition to settle the Darià ©n region: Pizarro served as second in command to Vasco Nuà ±ez de Balboa. First South American Expeditions In Panama, Pizarro established a partnership with fellow conquistador Diego de Almagro. News of Hernà ¡n Cortà ©s audacious (and lucrative) conquest of the Aztec Empire fueled the burning desire for gold among all of the Spanish in the New World, including Pizarro and Almagro. They made two expeditions from 1524 to 1526 along the western coast of South America: harsh conditions and native attacks drove them back both times. On the second trip, they visited the mainland and the Inca city of Tumbes, where they saw llamas and local chieftains with silver and gold. These men told of a great ruler in the mountains, and Pizarro became more convinced than ever that there was another rich Empire like the Aztecs to be looted. Third Expedition Pizarro personally went to Spain to make his case to the king that he should be allowed a third chance. King Charles, impressed with this eloquent veteran, agreed and awarded Pizarro the governorship of lands he acquired. Pizarro brought his four brothers back with him to Panama: Gonzalo, Hernando, Juan Pizarro, and Francisco Martà ­n de Alcà ¡ntara. In 1530, Pizarro and Almagro returned to the western shores of South America. On his third expedition, Pizarro had about 160 men and 37 horses. They landed on what is now the coast of Ecuador near Guayaquil. By 1532 they made it back to Tumbes: it was in ruins, having been destroyed in the Inca Civil War. The Inca Civil War While Pizarro was in Spain, Huayna Capac, Emperor of the Inca, had died, possibly of smallpox. Two of Huayna Capacs sons began fighting over the Empire: Huà ¡scar, the elder of the two, controlled the capital of Cuzco. Atahualpa, the younger brother, controlled the northern city of Quito, but more importantly had the support of three major Inca Generals: Quisquis, Rumià ±ahui, and Chalcuchima. A bloody civil war raged across the Empire as Huà ¡scar and Atahualpas supporters fought. Sometime in mid-1532, General Quisquis routed Huà ¡scars forces outside of Cuzco and took Huà ¡scar prisoner. The war was over, but the Inca Empire was in ruins just as a far greater threat approached: Pizarro and his soldiers. Capture of Atahualpa In November 1532, Pizarro and his men headed inland, where another extremely lucky break was awaiting them. The nearest Inca city of any size to the conquistadors was Cajamarca, and Emperor Atahualpa happened to be there. Atahualpa was savoring his victory over Huà ¡scar: his brother was being brought to Cajamarca in chains. The Spanish arrived in Cajamarca unopposed: Atahualpa did not consider them a threat. On November 16, 1532, Atahualpa agreed to meet with the Spanish. The Spanish treacherously attacked the Inca, capturing Atahualpa and murdering thousands of his soldiers and followers. Pizarro and Atahualpa soon made a deal: Atahualpa would go free if he could pay a ransom. The Inca selected a large hut in Cajamarca and offered to fill it half full with golden objects, and then fill the room twice with silver objects. The Spanish quickly agreed. Soon the treasures of the Inca Empire began flooding into Cajamarca. The people were restless, but none of Atahualpas generals dared attack the intruders. Hearing rumors that the Inca generals were planning an attack, the Spanish executed Atahualpa on July 26, 1533. After Atahualpa Pizarro appointed a puppet Inca, Tupac Huallpa, and marched on Cuzco, the heart of the Empire. They fought four battles along the way, defeating the native warriors every time. Cuzco itself did not put up a fight: Atahualpa had recently been an enemy, so many of the people there viewed the Spanish as liberators. Tupac Huallpa sickened and died: he was replaced by Manco Inca, a half-brother to Atahualpa and Huà ¡scar. The city of Quito was conquered by Pizarro agent Sebastià ¡n de Benalcà ¡zar in 1534 and, apart from isolated areas of resistance, Peru belonged to the Pizarro brothers. Pizarros partnership with Diego de Almagro had been strained for some time. When Pizarro had gone to Spain in 1528 to secure royal charters for their expedition, he had acquired for himself the governorship of all lands conquered and a royal title: Almagro only got a title and the governorship of the small town of Tumbez. Almagro was furious and nearly refused to participate in their third joint expedition: only the promise of the governorship of as-yet undiscovered lands made him come around. Almagro never quite shook the suspicion (probably correct) that the Pizarro brothers were trying to cheat him out of his fair share of the loot. In 1535, after the Inca Empire was conquered, the crown ruled that the northern half belonged to Pizarro and the southern half to Almagro: however, vague wording allowed both conquistadors to argue that the rich city of Cuzco belonged to them. Factions loyal to both men nearly came to blows: Pizarro and Almagro met and decided that Almagro would lead an expedition to the south (into present-day Chile). It was hoped that he would find great wealth there and drop his claim to Peru. Inca Revolts Between 1535 and 1537 the Pizarro brothers had their hands full. Manco Inca, the puppet ruler, escaped and went into open rebellion, raising a massive army and laying siege to Cuzco. Francisco Pizarro was in the newly founded city of Lima most of the time, trying to send reinforcements to his brothers and fellow conquistadors in Cuzco and organizing shipments of wealth to Spain (he was always conscientious about setting aside the royal fifth, a 20% tax collected by the crown on all treasure collected). In Lima, Pizarro had to fend off a ferocious attack led by Inca General Quizo Yupanqui in August of 1536. The First Almagrist Civil War Cuzco, under siege by Manco Inca in early 1537, was rescued by the return of Diego de Almagro from Peru with what was left of his expedition. He lifted the siege and drove off Manco, only to take the city for himself, capturing Gonzalo and Hernando Pizarro in the process. In Chile, the Almagro expedition had found only harsh conditions and ferocious natives: he had come back to claim his share of Peru. Almagro had the support of many Spaniards, primarily those who had come to Peru too late to share in the spoils: they hoped that if the Pizarros were overthrown that Almagro would reward them with lands and gold. Gonzalo Pizarro escaped, and Hernando was released by Almagro as part of the peace negotiations. With his brothers behind him, Francisco decided to do away with his old partner once and for all. He sent Hernando into the highlands with an army of conquistadors, and they met Almagro and his supporters on April 26, 1538, at the Battle of Salinas. Hernando was victorious, while Diego de Almagro was captured, tried, and executed on July 8, 1538. Almagros execution was shocking to the Spaniards in Peru, as he had been raised to nobleman status by the king some years before. Death For the next three years, Francisco mainly remained in Lima, administrating his empire. Although Diego de Almagro had been defeated, there was still much resentment among late-coming conquistadors against the Pizarro brothers and the original conquistadors, who had left slim pickings after the fall of the Inca Empire. These men rallied around Diego de Almagro the younger, son of Diego de Almagro and a woman from Panama. On June 26, 1541, supporters of the younger Diego de Almagro, led by Juan de Herrada, entered Francisco Pizarros home in Lima and assassinated him and his half-brother Francisco Martà ­n de Alcà ¡ntara. The old conquistador put up a good fight, taking down one of his attackers with him. With Pizarro dead, the Almagrists seized Lima and held it for almost a year before an alliance of Pizarrists (led by Gonzalo Pizarro) and royalists put it down. The Almagrists were defeated at the Battle of Chupas on September 16, 1542: Diego de Almagro the younger was captured and executed shortly after that. Legacy The cruelty and violence of the conquest of Peru is undeniable—it was essentially outright theft, mayhem, murder, and rape on a massive scale—but it is hard not to respect the sheer nerve of Francisco Pizarro. With only 160 men and a handful of horses, he brought down one of the largest civilizations in the world. His brazen capture of Atahualpa and decision to back the Cuzco faction in the simmering Inca civil war gave the Spaniards enough time to gain a foothold in Peru that they would never lose. By the time Manco Inca realized that the Spanish would not settle for anything less than the complete usurpation of his empire, it was too late. As far as the conquistadors go, Francisco Pizarro was not the worst of the lot (which isnt necessarily saying much). Other conquistadors, such as Pedro de Alvarado and his brother Gonzalo Pizarro, were much crueler in their dealings with the native population. Francisco could be cruel and violent, but in general, his acts of violence served some purpose, and he tended to think his actions through much more than others did. He realized that wantonly murdering the native population was not a sound plan in the long run, so he did not practice it. Francisco Pizarro married Inà ©s Huaylas Yupanqui, the daughter of the Inca emperor Huayna Capa, and she had two children: Francisca Pizarro Yupanqui (1534–1598) and Gonzalo Pizarro Yupanqui (1535–1546). Pizarro, like Hernà ¡n Cortà ©s in Mexico, is honored sort of halfheartedly in Peru. There is a statue of him in Lima and some streets and businesses are named after him, but most Peruvians are ambivalent about him at best. They all know who he was and what he did, but most present-day Peruvians do not find him much worthy of admiration. Sources Burkholder, Mark and Lyman L. Johnson. Colonial Latin America. Fourth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Hemming, John. The Conquest of the Inca. London: Pan Books, 2004 (original 1970).Herring, Hubert. A History of Latin America From the Beginnings to the Present. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1962Patterson, Thomas C. The Inca Empire: The Formation and Disintegration of a Pre-Capitalist State. New York: Berg Publishers, 1991.Varon Gabai, Rafael. Francisco Pizarro and His Brothers: The Illusion of Power in Sixteenth-Century Peru. trans. Flores Espinosa, Javier. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1997.

The Ultimate Leadership Essay Topics Trick

The Ultimate Leadership Essay Topics Trick The exact same rules of engagement apply but not it's more complex since you are communicating with numerous persons simultaneously, and so are they. Then to assist you in your reflection there are a few questions to answer or a self-assessment exercise. Put simply, decisions ought to be balanced, with only the proper quantity of empathy and objectivity. Providing you're diligent and finish the review each day, by the close of the month you will observe a considerable shift, away from the behaviours that you want to eradicate, towards the behaviours you need to cultivate. President Trump brought something specific and he's trying to make his distinctive contribution. A number of the ethics a leader should maintain. In other words, he cannot surpass his or her own ability to lead. How every leader may be terrific motivator. Leadership Essay Topics - Is it a Scam? Just because you're a terrific sales person doesn't mean that you wil l be an effective leader. At this time you've got an overwhelming urge to find out more about God and experience the exact same feeling of peace and connectedness everyday. Sometimes what you're passionate about emerges from a complicated circumstance, sometimes you're able to discover it by working on distinct projects with the goal of seeing whether you can derive satisfaction from the job. Unfortunately, at times it isn't the persons with the increased good of the group in mind. The Pain of Leadership Essay Topics Nobody would like to celebrate. Dig deeper to figure out how you truly feel about your work. Team conversations have the potential to conserve time, there isn't any need to go from 1 person to the next because, everyone receives the exact same information at precisely the same moment. Leadership Essay Topics - the Story If there's a deficiency of foundational learning and development, the very first step is to guarantee baseline technical and behavioral skill s meet the minimal standard for the degree of performance defined in the work description. If you've selected leadership as the region of your research but can't choose the particular topic or the way to begin selecting then here are a number of topics to help you begin. As a leader who's developing your team you are able to take different learning styles and learning curves under consideration. As you regard feedback and its effects, I ask that you give thought to how you are able to achieve meaningful changes in the way you provide feedback to your team and also, how you are able to influence the method by which they communicate with one another. Leaders sense the whole playing field. Careers can ride on professional knowledge only for a specific distance. Students often choose a good are but get confused in regards to selecting the particular topic in that region. The War Against Leadership Essay Topics Communication may be a two-person sport. AI applications might just be starting to take root within HR, but their influence is likely to increase significantly during the next several decades. After you perceive the need, the next thing to do is to analyse the issue then choose the criteria that should be met in order for alternatives to be generated. At other times alternatives are presented. however, it is obvious that there is just one choice. Important and elaborate decisions should integrate because many points of view as possible every time a top quality decision is the desired outcome. Then there are decisions that may happen within parameters fixed by the strategic plan. When leaders are not aware of their biases, they have a tendency to pick persons for their teams since they seem most like them. The workplace is growing more fragile and employees wish to understand what they are ultimately being held accountable for and what they can or cannot do. Employees will model your behavior so it's important that you know about the behaviors you're approving. In today's workplace, it's important for less experienced managers to construct trust and team dynamics that support collaboration in any way levels. In different organizations, decisions empower employees and result in engagement. On occasion the competition stay faceless and nameless.

Gatsby And Goodbye Columbus Essay Research Paper free essay sample

Gatsby And Goodbye Columbus Essay, Research Paper Sometimes there are two novels that have the same subject, and sometimes they have the same secret plan, but in the instance of the two novels, The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, and the fresh Goodbye Columbus, by Philip Roth they explore the same kineticss of the pursuit of the American dream. In both novels there are similar subjects, they both use the thought of sex and money as a signifier of power. Both novels can associate to each other because the writers decided to demo how the chase of the American dream may non ever be a good thing, and how sex and money can do jobs in that chase. Overall in both of the novels the reoccurring subject of sex, money and the hunt for the American dream is present and in both novels the writers show that merely because it may look like person may hold everything, that is non ever the instance. The thought of the new universe verses the old universe is a major premiss in the fresh Goodbye Columbus. In this novel there are two households who live really different lives. The Patimkin household, and the Klugman household. They represent the battle between the new and old universe. The Patimkin household is the affluent middle-class household and they live in the hills, they besides belong to the state nine, which is a representation of holding money and populating the American dream. The thought of belonging to the state nine is a major portion of the novel. The state nine gave the Patimkin? s a reproduction of in-between category life in America. Since the Patimkin? s were Judaic they didn? Ts have the chance to belong to a regular state nine, they belonged to the Judaic one, which is why it was the closest reproduction of the American dream to them, because they were non allowed to be portion of the non-Jewish state nines. The Patimikin? s represent the new universe, they ac hieved higher success and they are able to place with the non-Jewish portion of in-between category society a batch more so their fellow Judaic immigrants who have non to the full assimilated to society. On the other side of the coin there is the Klugman household. They represent the old universe. They live in the vale with the remainder of the Judaic immigrants and they live sparingly because they do non hold that much and they have non gained much success in their lives while life in the United States. The two characters that represent the old and new universe are Brenda Patimkin and Neil Klugman. To Neil, Brenda represents what he does non hold, money and position within the Jewish community. Her household can belong to the state nine and they can afford to hold nice things. Brenda besides represents sex to Neil hence she represents two of the major subjects of the novel, sex and money. To Neil there are many differences in the Patimkin household that make them really different from his ain. They are able to eat in the dining room alternatively of the kitchen. They have a amah that makes the repasts and cleans up after them. They besides have a icebox full of fruit that is ever fu ll. This is all the ideal life for Neil, and when you put Brenda in the mix you have Neil? s perfect universe. If he could go portion of the Patimkin household he would hold sex, money and in kernel the American dream. Those three thoughts are besides present in the novel The Great Gatsby. In this fresh the two universes are divided by old and new money, alternatively of the thought of assimilation to society after in-migration. In this novel, where you live determines your wealth, merely as it did in the fresh Goodbye Columbus. In The Great Gatsby the thought of wealth stand foring power is the most prevailing facet of the novel. The rubric character Jay Gatsby, is affluent and he lives in the new money side of town. The love of his life is Daisy Buchannan, and she lives on the old money side of town. Their love is similar to that of Neil and Brenda. They are symbols of two different universes, yet they find love, but in both of instances the love does non stop happy. It is a mark that possibly what you think is perfect and what you think is right for you is non ever the instance. In The Great Gatsby the subject of sex is besides a reoccurring one, many of the characters use sex as a signifier of power. It is easy to see that in both of the novels sex and money go manus in manus. Daisy and Gatsby wear? Ts have the same jobs that Brenda and Neil have, and they don? Ts have as large of a job covering with the different universes as they do. Their connexion is in the subjects, both work forces see the adult females as sex objects and they both see them as a symbol of money. In the instance of Gatsby, he does non see Daisy as a symbol of money every bit much as Neil sees Brenda that manner, but it is merely because Gatsby has his ain luck, and Neil does non. Yet Daisy is a representation of a adult females in the elect upper category, she has a high position in society, and she has besides grown up in wealth, something Gatsby did non make. So to him she does stand for something higher, merely like Brenda does with Neil. The adult females in both novels have a immense impact on the subjects. Daisy comes from a privileged household and has ever grown up in wealth, she h as a high position in her community and she is ever acquiring work forces to fall in love with her. She has a appeal and she is a symbol of higher position in society. She is used to acquiring what she wants. Brenda is really similar to Daisy in the fact that she represents a higher position for adult females in society besides. She has non ever grown up in wealth, but she is non that old, and hence she has non had that much clip without it. In her family she is treated like a princess, she is given everything she wants and her male parent treats her like she has a high standing in society, but her society is truly little in comparing to Daisy? s. She excessively, like Daisy is used to acquiring what she wants. Both adult females have a strong clasp on the adult male in their lives, they represent what both work forces want, but will neer hold. Gatsby wants to hold Daisy, but she is married and hence he merely lives his life desiring her, in Neil? s instance he has Brenda, but non tr uly because she is able to command every facet of their relationship. The adult females in both of the novels are representations of the subject of money and power. The subject of sex is present in both The Great Gatsby and in Goodbye Columbus. In The Great Gatsby, the fresh focal points on one adult males compulsion with a married adult female. There is besides a great trade of excess matrimonial personal businesss traveling on in the novel. Daisy? s hubby is ever holding an matter, and for much of the novel he is holding an matter with another married adult female. The characters in the novel usage sex as a manner to derive power and they use it to besides turn out their power. Daisy? s hubby is ever holding an matter to demo that he can make whatever it is he wants to make. The adult females he is holding an matter with, Myrtle is making it to increase her position in society. When she is with Tom and when she is at their secret topographic point in the metropolis she feels like she is a affluent individual, something that her ain hubby can non give her. To each of the characters person else represents something that they want, and they use s ex as a manner to derive it. Even though Neil is in love with Brenda he still sees her as a manner to derive a better life for himself. While he is at her house he is ever taking advantage of the fact that they have nicer things and that they ever have a full icebox of fresh fruit. The fruit itself is alien and represents something affluent people have, his household can non afford to hold the fruit, therefore he eats an abundant sum while he is at the Patimkins, and he even takes some and fells it in his pocket. For all of these characters the narrative does non stop merrily. For Gatsby you find out that he is non truly in love with Daisy, but the thought of her. He remembers what they had together a long clip ago, and he sets his sights on holding her once more, but what he truly wants is non Daisy herself, but the phantasy that he has created. You besides find out that he is non a really admirable individual, but one that has lost all sense of world. As the narrative goes on he has lost touch with the existent universe and has moved into a universe of phantasy that he has created for himself. We besides come to recognize that Daisy is non the image of flawlessness herself. Fitzgerald spends most of the novel doing Daisy out to look guiltless, pure and perfect. By the terminal of the novel you find out that she is non what everyone thought she was, she turns out to be a really selfish, acrimonious adult female who is truly non worthy of the attending she gets from all of the work forces. In the other fresh Neil had another docket for traveling out with Brenda. He knew that get marrieding into her household would give him a higher position in life. He besides loved her, but he excessively, like Gatsby was more in love with the thought of holding Brenda so Brenda herself. By the terminal of the novel Neil could non stand the fact that Brenda was able to make whatever she wanted in the relationship and this caused him to overreact and coerce her to make something she didn? Ts truly want to make. Brenda excessively had her mistakes, she was raised believing she was a princess, merely as Daisy thought that she was particular because she had ever been raised as a affluent immature miss, and both adult females ever got what they wanted. So when Brenda was with Neil she expected him to handle her the same manner her male parent had ever treated her, and she expected to acquire what she wanted when she wanted it. The struggle between what each individual wanted is what lead t o the terminal of both novels. In Goodbye Columbus Neil and Brenda split after Neil realizes that he wants a manner out of the relationship, so the two end up interrupting up in the terminal. In The Great Gatsby Daisy and Gatsby neer end up together, but Gatsby? s undying devotedness to Daisy does stop up acquiring him killed. This shows that the subject of sex in both novels is at that place to turn out that it is non ever the best thing to hold and that it is non the foundation for a really good relationship. The subject of sex has more to make with holding power, which is something that all of the characters in both novels dream about holding. Bibliography The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald Goodbye Columbus, by Philip Roth